Nod. I had all of the files in one directory and signed them all at once...
On 2/9/09 10:39 AM, "Scott Comer (sccomer)" <[email protected]> wrote: > i'm thinking rat output doesn't need to be signed. just saying... > > James Dixson wrote: >> Ok folks I believe we have a release candidate for 1.0.2. I completed >> the license/txt changes suggested by the Apache-Rat tool and validated >> the builds on Windows, OS X and Ubuntu. I also did some cleanup of the >> top-level directory to reduce clutter. >> >> The candidate files can be found here: >> http://people.apache.org/~dixson/apache-etch/1.0.2-incubating/ >> >> Each file should have a MD5, SHA1 and a Signature. The output from RAT >> is also included "*-rat-output.txt". >> >> Please take the time to review the archives and then cast your vote. I >> will hold the vote open until the 13th (Friday). >> >> -- >> james >> > -- James Dixson Manager, Software Development CUAE Engineering, Cisco Systems (e) [email protected] (p) 512-336-3305 (m) 512-968-2116
