inline.

Niclas Hedhman wrote:
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 4:03 AM, scott comer <[email protected]> wrote:
ok, the artifact name issue is resolved i think.

i created a release tag:

etch/releases/release-1.1.0-rc1

artifacts posted here:

http://people.apache.org/~sccomer/etch-1.1.0-rc1/

what's left?

run rat.
check out the notices and readme and release notes and stuff.
download and test the artifacts.

1. People in the Incubator will complain if the tag is not containing
the 'incubating' word, so copy the one you have into a new name, and
kill the old tag.
nod.
2. Rat reports a lot of "????", which shows at the top as "unapproved
licenses". For all files that supports comments, the Apache standard
header should be used. Need to fix this.
yes. i don't see any way to customize (despite words that say you can, must be in the source code that i can do that) rat's list of file types that matter. *.vcproj and readme style text files would seem to fall into the category of files that don't matter. i'm working on the complaints today to resolve the
legitimate issues.
Since you don't distribute any of the "Dependencies", I would
recommend that you rename it to "System Requirements". Apache allows
system requirements of stuff with just about any license, whereas
redistributed dependencies must be of certain kinds. My guess is that
you codebase may actually "dependOn" velocity, so perhaps a bit
surprise to see it not included in the distro. JavaCC is another one
that should perhaps be redistributed (no problem, since it is BSD
license) to simplify for users and hence stay as a "Dependency".
not sure what you're saying here. we do distribute velocity in our binary image. because it is needed at runtime by the compiler. we have no other runtime dependencies. the rest (javacc, junit, apr, ant, etc.) are build dependencies. are you suggesting we should put those into our source tree as well? (personally, i'd like that, as the current scheme has a pretty high barrier
to getting started and lots of twitchy settings to keep it working).

scott out

Reply via email to