Hallo, I would like to give +1 too, let us try to get the release 1.1 of Etch in place with the mentioned feature set.
Thanks, Michael -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: Holger Grandy [mailto:[email protected]] Gesendet: Dienstag, 14. September 2010 11:58 An: [email protected] Betreff: [VOTE] Contents of Release 1.1 Hi guys, since Scott is mentioning voting procedures, I would like to pick up that point and start a vote regarding a upcoming release 1.1 of Etch. Vote will run for 72 hours until Friday. I propose that we publish Release 1.1 with the C binding implementation included in the next weeks (as stated in the mail below). Please vote: -1 : no, release 1.1 should not contain the C binding, because ... 0 : I don't care +1 : Release 1.1 should be published with the C binding as described below ---- +1 from me Regards, Holger -----Original Message----- From: scott comer [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Montag, 13. September 2010 15:27 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Future of Etch well, much as martijn might wish otherwise, there are procedures for voting such a plan. i don't like two things: 1) please don't remove the tag. 2) why not proceed with the release 1.1 as is, and release 1.2 with c binding from trunk. less confusion. scott out On 9/13/2010 2:36 AM, Martijn Dashorst wrote: > On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 4:14 PM, Holger Grandy > <[email protected]> wrote: >> We have seen an older mail regarding release 1.1. from April. I propose we >> start over to prepare a release >> package in September and initiate a PMC vote regarding that when its ready. >> Will create Jiras for that. >> Proposal: remove the old release 1.1 branch, merge etch-c into trunk, fix >> bugs, create new release >> branch from trunk for 1.1 > This sounds like a good plan. Go for it. > > Martijn
