This vote was started on the 7th - 5 days later I'd say our 72 hour voting window is closed.
Holger, as the one who started the vote, can you close it please, on both lists. Thanks Gav... > -----Original Message----- > From: scott comer [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Monday, 11 October 2010 1:10 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [VOTE] 1.1 release packages > > i requested white listing our installer by norton. > > if we update the installer before the final release, we'll need to > update the white listing, too. > > oh, despite the few nits i posted, i think the release is fine. let's > do it! > > +1 > > scott out > > On 10/10/2010 6:04 AM, Gav... wrote: > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Holger Grandy [mailto:[email protected]] > >> Sent: Thursday, 7 October 2010 12:45 AM > >> To: [email protected] > >> Subject: [VOTE] 1.1 release packages > >> > >> Hello, > >> > >> I created zips and tar.gzs for the upcoming 1.1 release of Apache > Etch. > >> All files are currently placed in my home directory at > >> > >> http://people.apache.org/~grandyho/apache-etch-1.1.0-incubating/ > >> > >> Instructions for building the source packages can be found in the > >> README.txt and > >> BUILD.txt file and on the website > >> http://incubator.apache.org/etch/building-trunk.html > >> > >> Please vote to publish these files on the website: > >> http://incubator.apache.org/etch/downloads.html > >> > >> This vote will run for 72 hours. > >> > >> Thanks for your votes, > >> Holger > > Thanks, > > > > First off, some great Build and Readme files, very detailed. > > > > Some minor points (apologies for the length of some of these): > > > > 1. I'm not sure why the BMW Copyright has been added to the > Notice.txt file? > > > > The two copyrights in there are for Cisco - which is where the code > was > > developed > > and lived before it came to the ASF. The second copyright is for > Apache - > > where > > the code lives and is developed now. BMW and its employees have > provided > > CCLA and > > ICLAs so I'm not sure the BMW copyright is correct. BMW certainly > should be > > recognised as a contributor and for provided its employees with time > to work > > on > > the project. I could be wrong however, and I defer this as a question > that > > should > > be raised after the release, I'm not blocking it based on this. > > > > 2. ChangeLog.txt seems to be an old version of the file > RELEASE_NOTES.txt. > > Having > > both files included in confusing, especially considering the > ChangeLog.txt > > seems to > > be based on the initial release attempt a year ago and is well > outdated. I > > would like to > > see this file removed and the tarballs re-rolled. This however is a > > suggestion and again > > I am not going to block based on this. > > > > 3. You mention above that you will publish the files to > > http://incubator.apache.org/etch/downloads.html . > > > > Please - DO NOT publish the release files to this page. What you do > is > > publish the files > > to the people.apache.org machine to > /www/www.apache.org/dist/incubator/etch/ > > - take a look > > at other directories in the /www/www.apache.org/dist/incubator/ for > > examples. This ensures > > that releases are automatically populated to the official Apache > Mirror > > sites across the > > world for download. You then place links on the above mentioned > downloads > > page to the > > mirrors. Assuming the vote passes, I will help you will this. I will > also > > see that the > > current 1.0.2 files are removed from the downloads page and put into > an > > archives download > > area. There are plenty of examples around but see > > > > http://incubator.apache.org/photark/photark-downloads.html > > > > for example of how they link to the mirrors. > > > > 4. You have LICENCE_THIRD_PARTY.txt and NOTICE_THIRD_PARTY.txt files > -- both > > contain licenses > > and notices for the Apache APR project. APR is an Apache Licensed > product, I > > don't think that counts > > as a third party license. I do not think that these files are needed. > I will > > check this but > > I am not holding up the vote because of it. > > > > 5. When downloading the Windows exe version Norton FileInsight > program > > removes it as a threat > > to the system. I have pasted the details below for you to examine and > > perhaps improve upon > > for the next release. > > > > c:\users\gmcdonald\downloads\apache-etch-1.1.0-incubating-windows- > x86-setup. > > exe > > ____________________________ > > ____________________________ > > On computer as of > > 10/10/2010 at 8:55:28 PM > > Last Used: > > 10/10/2010 at 8:57:50 PM > > Startup Item: No > > Launched: No > > ____________________________ > > ____________________________ > > Very Few Users > > Fewer than 10 users in the Norton Community have used this file. > > ____________________________ > > Medium > > This file risk is medium. > > ____________________________ > > Threat Details > > There are many indications that this file is untrustworthy and > therefore not > > safe > > ____________________________ > > Origin > > > > Downloaded from > > http://people.apache.org/~grandyho/apache-etch-1.1.0- > incubating/apache-etch- > > 1.1.0-incubating-windows-x86-setup.exe > > ____________________________ > > http://people.apache.org/~grandyho/apache-etch-1.1.0- > incubating/apache-etch- > > 1.1.0-incubating-windows-x86-setup.exe > > SAFE > > > > Downloaded File: > > apache-etch-1.1.0-incubating-windows-x86-setup.exe > > ____________________________ > > File Actions > > File: > > c:\users\gmcdonald\downloads\apache-etch-1.1.0-incubating-windows- > x86-setup. > > exe > > Removed > > ____________________________ > > > > > > > > Finally, Etch folks, if you are still with me, the above I believe > are not > > release blockers, so here > > is my +1 on releasing. Nice work all. > > > > Gav... > > > > > > > > > >
