What about just rough concensus of this list? I think that would be sufficient to change the license. It's obviously enough to change the code.
On Sunday, 24 Mar 2002, Hamish Moffatt wrote: > On Sat, Mar 23, 2002 at 04:01:31AM -0500, Adam wrote: > > it seems to me like there are no downsides for this solution, apart > > from having to contact every author. > > I agree. > > > According to AUTHORS file it would be 188 ppl. With some probably on > > vacations, or not having valid emails anymore :( > > It could take some time, but it is possible I assume. Mind you, I > know that one of them who I know personally no longer has the > listed email address. > > Hamish > -- > Hamish Moffatt VK3SB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > _______________________________________________ > Ethereal-dev mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://www.ethereal.com/mailman/listinfo/ethereal-dev > -- David Frascone To be, or not to be. *BOOM!* Not to be.
