Guy Harris writes: > > On Oct 21, 2003, at 2:21 PM, Dinesh G Dutt wrote: > > > You're right. With newer versions of the feature, it is possible to > > get the > > actual frame length as part of the packet (for example it is a field > > in the > > Boardwalk header). > > OK, then: > > if you have the frame length, either the ability to set the reported > length of a tvbuff to a *larger* value than it currently has should be > added, and you should use that, or you should construct a new > "top-level" tvbuff with the specified reported length; What would happen if reassembly is attempted for such frames ? Thanks,
Dinesh -- I am not young enough to know everything. - Oscar Wilde
