-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Would anyone care to comment on my point that a language for describing packets in terms of their bits and bytes may not be appropriate for describing flows of information in terms of the packets which carry them? This could help to explain why some efforts are still working on flow issues such as reassembly.
- -- Mark H. Wood, Lead System Programmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] MS Windows *is* user-friendly, but only for certain values of "user". -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: pgpenvelope 2.10.2 - http://pgpenvelope.sourceforge.net/ iD8DBQE/Rhx8s/NR4JuTKG8RAhqiAJ9BKb1wBAGJ0rMknvhzMgLvL38ZHwCfY4Do JwJ+Va8VE3NJybM6dJtUtXg= =BIXV -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
