On Mon, Nov 11, 2002 at 02:54:37PM -0800, Scott Renfro wrote:
> > If we're going to use an external library, then OpenSSL is by far the
> > best choice in my opinion. Its license allows linking with GPL code
I agree. In case we really want to care about the alleged problems of
openssl with gpl: Has someone had a look at the latest linux sources
(2.5.47)? I think they contain quite a few cryptographic funtions
(but haven't looked myself).
Ciao
J�rg
PS: I don't mind linking against openssl, and the only ones who could
*legally* object to our using openssl are the authors of ethereal.
In case there was someone who objects to the use, we could always
remove his code from ethereal.
--
Joerg Mayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I found out that "pro" means "instead of" (as in proconsul). Now I know
what proactive means.
