On Wed, 29 Oct 2003, Guy Harris wrote: > > On Oct 29, 2003, at 10:56 AM, Richard Sharpe wrote: > > > Should we develop an RFC? > > If by "RFC" you mean an Internet RFC, we should probably consider doing > that for libpcap-ng format; there's already one for snoop format > (although it's incomplete, as it doesn't describe atmsnoop format).
I mean this, eventually ... > If you just mean a proposed format for developers of various packet > analysis programs (tcpdump, Ethereal, snort, Kismet, etc.) to review, > yes, we should do that, although the developers of those programs > interested in libpcap-ng should probably be part of the group designing > the format. (I have some mail from a while ago discussing this with > some people, including, I think, Mike Kershaw of Kismet fame; I'll dig > it up.) I mean this too. However, we should go for an Internet Draft RFC and then, hopefully, an RFC. Regards ----- Richard Sharpe, rsharpe[at]ns.aus.com, rsharpe[at]samba.org, sharpe[at]ethereal.com, http://www.richardsharpe.com
