Hi, According to my reading of RFC3530, 14.2.31, a SECINFO reply will contain, if the status is NFSok, and array of structures containing the OIDs of the mechanisms allowed.
In particular, it is not a Value Follows followed by 0 or one sec info structures ... which is how it is currently dissected ... Ahhh, I see the problem. packet-nfs.c has it coded to dissect a list rather than an array! BTW, why are the signatures for dissect_rpc_list and dissect_rpc_array inconsistent? I would expect both of them to take an hf_index, or neither to do so. Regards ----- Richard Sharpe, rsharpe[at]ns.aus.com, rsharpe[at]samba.org, sharpe[at]ethereal.com, http://www.richardsharpe.com
