On Fri, Feb 22, 2002 at 01:38:49AM -0500, Adam wrote: > does it look cool ? it is against current cvs tree.
Yes. Checked in. > http://www.eax.com The Supreme Headquarters of the 32 bit registers (An offtopic note: "AFAIK, there's no uniform naming for 64 bit registers (any registers for that matter) on 64 bit architecture." There isn't one for 32-bit architectures, either; only IA-32 uses names such as EAX. 32-bit MIPS, 32-bit SPARC, 32-bit PA-RISC, 32-bit members of the POWER family, 32-bit System/3x0, ARM, VAX, etc. use different names. There won't be one for 64-bit architectures, either; 64-bit versions of the ones I marked with "32-bit" (although "32-bit System/3x0" is called "z/Architecture") use different names, and there's also x86-64.... Intel may make the most 32-bit chips that go into general-purpose computers, but they're not the only maker of same, and a lot of 32-bit chips go into embedded systems; they're not the only maker of 64-bit chips that go into general-purpose computers, either.) > This patch adds more defintions as to what sort of > Attribute Value-Paris radiusd support. It also makes RD_TP_CONNECT_INFO a RADIUS_STRING rather than a RADIUS_STRING_TAGGED: > @@ -486,7 +497,16 @@ ... > -{ RD_TP_CONNECT_INFO, RADIUS_STRING_TAGGED}, ... > +{ RD_TP_CONNECT_INFO, RADIUS_STRING}, ... I assume it was supposed to do that.
