On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 09:46:56AM +0100, Gehnen, Gerrit wrote: > I'm searching some type of fragment_add__next() call, which adds packets to > the hash table in their incoming order
Well, that appears to be one potential flaw in the protocol - there's nothing guaranteeing ordered delivery in Ethernet. You'll *probably* get it on a non-switched Ethernet, assuming that the transmitting driver (and card) transmit packets in FIFO order, but I could imagine a switch not preserving FIFO order. (There's also no guarantee of reliable delivery....) > and uses preset total length information > in bytes for the datagrams. > Is this still to implement? Nobody's added such a call, so it'd have to be added.
