On Sun, Apr 13, 2003 at 07:06:36PM -0400, Kevin wrote: > The only "problem" area is the capture of frames at high data rates.
Just out of curiosity, can tcpdump (with "-s 65535", if no snapshot length was specified in Ethereal, or with "-s" specifying the same snapshot length, if a snapshot length was specified) or Tethereal do better? (I.e., is this an Ethereal issue, or a libpcap/underlying-packet- capture-mechanism issue?) > My favorite vendor test is to open a 9 gig trace file on FreeBSD with > Ethereal. I.e., the file is 9GB in size?
