Well, as I am not aware about the recent development or anything, I make
that decision up to you. This dissector works in this way.
/Niklas - who don't mind to learn how it's supposed to be like now
> Would not it be better to introduce the new dissector table
> ("rtp.pt") and register payload subdissector into it instead
> of dirrect calling from RTP dissector?
> Tom
>
> Cituji z emailu od Niklas �gren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > Hello everyone!
> >
> > I just subscribed to this list, to contribute with a H.263
> dissector.
> >
> > It's not heavily tested, only with some dumps I had hanging around
> > here.
> >
> > It's also only dissecting according to RFC2190, the RTP
> H.263 payload
> > header. I am planning to do a H.263 stream dissector any time soon
> > too.
> >
> > Please have a look, and include it in the codebase if it's alright!
> >
> > Regards, Niklas - niklas.ogren[AT]7l.se
>
>
>
