Hi! On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 12:39:31PM -0800, Guy Harris wrote: | | On Dec 3, 2003, at 2:43 AM, Ronnie Sahlberg wrote: | | >AFAICS your patch reverses the patch I added to packet-smb.c # 1.366 | >and changes it back into treating this field as a 64 bit integer in | >LittleEndian format. | | The reasons I know of for not just supporting 64-bit integral types in | Ethereal are
The suport to 64bit integers present in etherel, using 8-byte arrays, seems to be doing the job nicely. I mean, the discussion was not really about 64bit integers itself but about the handling of a special case where the protocol used two little endian 32bit words disposed as High32bit and Low32bit - in order to be used as a 64bit value. :) My complaint was about how the 32bit words were ordered by the code. Sorry for my poor and _ugly_ english :) Regards, Luis -- [ Luis Claudio R. Goncalves [EMAIL PROTECTED] ] [ Fingerprint: 4FDD B8C4 3C59 34BD 8BE9 2696 7203 D980 A448 C8F8 ] [ Msc has come!!!! - Conectiva HA Team - Gospel User - Linuxer - !Java ] [ Fault Tolerance - Real-Time - Distributed Systems - IECLB - IS 40:31 ] [ LateNite Programmer -- My Utmost for His Highest -- ] _______________________________________________ Ethereal-dev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.ethereal.com/mailman/listinfo/ethereal-dev
