From: Guy Harris | I think there was some discussion as to what version numbers | the Ethereal executable image name should reflect. | | Was it concluded that the image name should include "2" | if Ethereal was built for GTK+ 2.x? | | And, if we make GTK+ 2.x rather than 1.3[.x] the standard | version for Ethereal builds at some point, should the Ethereal | executable still have that "2" in its name?
How about calling the graphical tool "ethereal" and add a GUI-specific suffix to the binary: - ethereal-gtk1 - ethereal-gtk2 - ethereal-win32 (for the future native Win32 UI) We can still symlink on *NIX and create a named shortcut in Windows that points to the default graphical tool. This will be much more consistent, and simple to explain/understand/maintain/extend. Regards, Olivier _______________________________________________ Ethereal-dev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.ethereal.com/mailman/listinfo/ethereal-dev
