From: "Eric Wedel" Sent: Saturday, February 07, 2004 7:35 AM Subject: RE: [Ethereal-dev] kerberos update, new test version for those that are brave
> afaik, nettle should work fine, but that still leaves an intermediate > layer to be implemented. I understand. Would that intermediate layer require more than a few hundred lines if one only wants to implement support for the 4-5 most popular encryption/hashes to start with? Im not afraid of implementing stuff as long as it takes less than ten thousand lines. (and even then those limits are "vague" as packet-h225 and packet-h245 shows.) I feel Ethereal could really use this. That might not be as important as : I personally and colleagues REALLY NEED to open the tickets!!! I am not clear on what exactly the licence is for MIT-Kerberos but since it is crypto and developed in the us one might want to stay way clear of it. Heimdal would be an option (and is probably more common than MIT anyway) but it pulls in so much extra junk in the libs that ethereal would never need. Nettle is also redistribution unencumbered, is small, and implements almost all popular cryptos and hashes. _______________________________________________ Ethereal-dev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.ethereal.com/mailman/listinfo/ethereal-dev
