Re: [Ethereal-dev] FT_INT64 and Bitmasks

[Michael Tuexen]

Hi,

So does it mean we can make FT_UINT64 to be able to handle bitmasks?
What needs to be done?
Best regards
Michael
On 19. Feb 2004, at 7:52 Uhr, Dr. Uwe Girlich wrote:

Hello!

On Wed, Feb 18, 2004 at 12:37:10PM -0800, Guy Harris wrote:
Is that the MIPS-based platform where the native compiler doesn't 
support
64-bit integral data types at all?
ReliantUNIX 5.43 is MIPS 32 bits only but 5.44 and 5.45 (the current 
and last
(there will never be a follow-up)) are MIPS 64 bits with support for 
%ll.

If so, is it OK if we require 64-bit
integral data type support in Ethereal, or should we fix up the places
where we currently use it?
I use GCC for compiling on all systems, thus there is a 64 bit data 
type
available even on ReliantUNIX 5.43 and also SINIX-Z (really old 
Siemens UNIX
for i386).

    2) use our own routine to format 64-bit integers into strings, 
and use
that to generate output rather than using %ll/%q/%L/etc.
That would be nice. I just looked up the source for such a decimal 
formatter,
which is really easy (if there is a 64 bit data type available).

Bye, Uwe

_______________________________________________
Ethereal-dev mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.ethereal.com/mailman/listinfo/ethereal-dev
_______________________________________________
Ethereal-dev mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.ethereal.com/mailman/listinfo/ethereal-dev