> -----Message d'origine----- > De: Guy Harris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Date: jeudi 5 décembre 2002 22:19 > À: EXT / SITICOM KURZWEG > Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > Objet: Re: [Ethereal-users] unsupported Ethernet type 10 > > > >4 is SNOOP_ETHERNET and 10 is SNOOP_FAST_ETHERNET; was the device on >which the capture was done attached to different networks at the times >you did the two captures, one a 10Mb/s Ethernet and one a 100Mb/s >Ethernet? If not, I have no idea why it provided two different >link-layer types.
After having checked, I can confirm that point: captures were indeed made on different network devices. I can read those that were captured from a 10 Mb/s port but not those captured from a 100 Mb/s port. This means that Optiview devices are using the Shomiti variant (hence, type 10 for Fast Ethernet captures), and that we've got a conflict.
