> I assume you meant microseconds here, which are usually shortened to µs or > us, not ms (which is milliseconds). Cycle times of 1500ms would be quite > bad for most applications. :)
Yes, of course, sorry. > Given that one of your requirements (judging from your previous patches) is > EoE support, that might be tricky without kernel support. Why? As I wrote, I plan to use a tap/tun deivce for that. Regards, Frank -- Dipl.-Math. Frank Heckenbach <f.heckenb...@fh-soft.de> Stubenlohstr. 6, 91052 Erlangen, Germany, +49-9131-21359 Systems Programming, Software Development, IT Consulting _______________________________________________ etherlab-dev mailing list etherlab-dev@etherlab.org http://lists.etherlab.org/mailman/listinfo/etherlab-dev
