Hello Ricardo, > Thank you very much for you contribution. Once I am less busy at work > I would like to repack it to openembedded (which should be really easy > due to the way you have packed it). I hope it is ok with you.
Yes, sure. > For our system it makes much more sense a user space library, because > we don't have any hard requirement to met. Glad to hear so. I think for such kinds of applications, EtherCAT is just another network protocol, and needing a kernel module is really overkill. Fortunately, the kernel dependencies of the original code weren't very strong, otherwise I couldn't have done the port in the time I had available. Most of the code, especially the tricky protocol logic, is rather generic C code. > I hope that at some point > this is merged with the main project. I'd hope so too, but from what I've (not) seen so far, it seems unlikely to me. Regards, Frank -- Dipl.-Math. Frank Heckenbach <f.heckenb...@fh-soft.de> Stubenlohstr. 6, 91052 Erlangen, Germany, +49-9131-21359 Systems Programming, Software Development, IT Consulting _______________________________________________ etherlab-dev mailing list etherlab-dev@etherlab.org http://lists.etherlab.org/mailman/listinfo/etherlab-dev
