Hi, I was looking through the CoE code recently (specifically trying to decide whether to implement ETG1004 (unit specification) in a slave -- given that neither Etherlab nor the SSC appears to support it though, I'm leaning towards not) and noticed something a little odd.
In fsm_coe.c's ec_fsm_coe_dict_prepare_entry, the value info byte is specified as 0x01 for "access rights only". According to ETG1000.6 5.6.3.6, that bit is "reserved" and the access rights are supplied in the response regardless. So shouldn't this be 0x00 instead of 0x01? Or is there some historic reason for this that I'm unaware of? Regards, Gavin Lambert _______________________________________________ etherlab-dev mailing list etherlab-dev@etherlab.org http://lists.etherlab.org/mailman/listinfo/etherlab-dev
