Try running "ethercat slaves -v" against one specific AKD slave (in a working network) and see whether its ports are configured for auto-close or manual close. Compare it with other slaves, if possible.
Usually slaves should default to fully auto, so that they will loop packets back when there's no other downstream slave. But they can be configured to manually keep a port closed even when they detect a new downstream slave (to avoid disrupting the network until you're ready to configure it) or to keep it open even if there's no slave (which is normally a bad thing, but maybe there's some reason it might be useful?). Perhaps this latter is the case for your drives? Gavin Lambert Senior Software Developer COMPAC SORTING EQUIPMENT LTD | 4 Henderson Pl | Onehunga | Auckland 1061 | New Zealand Switchboard: +49 2630 96520 | https://www.tomra.com The information contained in this communication and any attachment is confidential and may be legally privileged. It should only be read by the person(s) to whom it is addressed. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender and delete the communication. -----Original Message----- From: Hugh Sparks Sent: Thursday, 7 November 2019 10:20 To: etherlab-users@etherlab.org Subject: [etherlab-users] Kollmorgen AKD drive doesn't like to be last I have several Kollmogen AKD drives that work perfectly anywhere on my ring except the last position. If an AKD is at the end of the "row", it doesn't seem to be turning the frames around properly. Is this some configuration option I'm missing? I've never seen this behavior from other motor drives... Thanks for any insights! H. Sparks _______________________________________________ etherlab-users mailing list etherlab-users@etherlab.org http://lists.etherlab.org/mailman/listinfo/etherlab-users
