On 7/12/05, Stefan Urbanek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Citát Quentin Mathé <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > Le 9 juil. 05 ŕ 12:31, Nicolas Roard a écrit : > > > > > On 7/9/05, Yen-Ju Chen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > >> On 7/8/05, Alex Perez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> > > >>> What about etoile.gnustep.org ? It has the advantage of being > > >>> free, and > > >>> it also emphasizes that it's a project based on GNUstep, so it's > > >>> free > > >>> advertising for GNUstep itself as well. > > >> > > >> It is the best idea I ever heard. > > >> Definitely vote for it. > > > > > > Personally I'd prefer a distinct site like > > > etoile-project.org/etoileproject.org (we can have both after all), AND > > > etoile.gnustep.org as a redirection to this distinct site. It will > > > simplify things :-) > > > > I agree with Nicolas, I'm not really sure it is a good idea to have > > explicit reference to GNUstep, GNUstep will be visible on developer > > side but not on user side ideally. Moreover GNUstep is more a > > technical choice than a "philosophical base", we are still very > > inspired by NeXT philosophy but we are moving away from it too. To > > take a caricatural example, etoile.gnustep.org would look a bit like > > gnome.gtk.org in my opinion… ;-) > > > > Hm, I have changed my mind. I agree with you at this point.
Ok, so everybody agrees with etoile-project.org ? note that we can *also* have a etoile.gnustep.org redirection and an alias from etoileproject.org if we want. -- Nicolas Roard "Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic." -Arthur C. Clarke
