On 5/2/07, Quentin Mathé <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Le 2 mai 07 à 02:43, Yen-Ju Chen a écrit :
>
> > Author: yjchen
> > Date: Wed May  2 02:43:47 2007
> > New Revision: 1816
> >
> > URL: http://svn.gna.org/viewcvs/etoile?rev=1816&view=rev
> > Log:
> > Trun EtoileFoundation into framework
> >
> > Added:
> >     trunk/Etoile/Frameworks/EtoileFoundation/Headers/Cocoa.h
> >       - copied unchanged from r1815, trunk/Etoile/Frameworks/
> > EtoileFoundation/Headers/Cocoa/Cocoa.h
> > Removed:
> >     trunk/Etoile/Frameworks/EtoileFoundation/Headers/Cocoa/Cocoa.h
>
> You wonder why I put Cocoa.h in a Cocoa directory. iirc that's just
> because the compilation failed otherwise since the import statement
> is <Cocoa/Cocoa.h>
> It's probably simpler to replace it by <AppKit/AppKit.h>. I didn't do
> it initially because Uli was working on these files and it was easier
> that way to keep them in sync with his own version. But they haven't
> really evolved since then… so it doesn't matter anymore. Uli could
> have replaced Cocoa.h by AppKit.h too ;-)

  A side note, I realize gnustep-gui install a Cocoa/Cocoa.h, too.
  I notice that when I compile the Jabber, which also use Cocoa/Cocoa.h.
  I realize that after I finish the EtoileFoundation, EtoileUI and
DistributedView.
  So I think it is safe to remove our own Cocoa.h since GNUstep provides it.

>
> Quentin.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Etoile-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/etoile-dev
>

_______________________________________________
Etoile-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/etoile-dev

Reply via email to