On 9/18/07, Quentin Mathé <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Le 18 sept. 07 à 04:06, Yen-Ju Chen a écrit : > > > > Frameworks/BookmarkKit - LGPL2 (Derivate work from AddressesKit) > > Frameworks/CollectionKit - LGPL2 (Derivate work from AddressesKit) >
There two are not used anywhere in Etoile. So I probably will move them into Deprecated later. > These two frameworks are probably going to be deprecated in favor of > OrganizeKit/CoreObject. > By the way, if you don't mind I would like to put current OrganizeKit > in a branch and rename trunk version as CoreObject. I would replace > OK prefix by CO one too. No problem and go ahead. > > Services/Private/AZSwitch - MIT > > Just out of curiosity, why AZSwitch isn't under BSD like other AZ > modules? No reason. I just happen to use MIT at that time. :) > > > Services/User/CodeEditor - LGPL2 > > Yen-Ju, is it possible to relicense it under BSD? Sure, but I may deprecate it later. So no hurry on this one. > > > Services/User/Sketch[4] - Apple > > Does anybody know whether this can be considered as a true BSD > license? I'm asking that because I'm currently using a NSCell > subclass taken from Apple code examples in Container/EtoileUI. > Container is licensed under BSD. May be as a precaution, I should > remove this piece of code before merging Container into EtoileUI? Here is my interpretation: 1. If you distribute *unmodified* codes, you have to keep the license. 2. If you modify codes and distribute it, you *cannot* use Apple's name. Since we distribute *modified* codes, based on (1), we don't need to keep the license. And based on (2), we cannot use Apple name. So I conclude we can delete the license ?! Yen-Ju > > Thanks for the in-depth license report :-) > Quentin. > > > _______________________________________________ > Etoile-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/etoile-dev > _______________________________________________ Etoile-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/etoile-dev
