On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 9:39 PM, Hubert Chathi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > > Can someone (Nicolas?) clarify what license Camaelon is? The README > file says that it is released under the "GNU Public License" (which > does not exist), while the COPYING file is the text of the GNU LGPL > 2.1. Also, there is no indication as to what version of the license > applies (e.g. is it LGPL 2.1 only? or LGPL 2.1 or any later version?)
It's under the LGPL, not the GPL. For the version, no idea -- I mean, iirc I simply used the version that was available at the time. What are the differences with the latest version ? If it's necessary we can relicence it without much trouble (have to check the logs but I believe that only me and quentin did work on it). The main idea behind the licencing simply was that, considering ObjC, and considering the "plugin" nature of Camaelon, it had to be under the LGPL and not the GPL. -- Nicolas Roard "Java, the best argument for Smalltalk since C++ " -- Frank Winkler _______________________________________________ Etoile-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/etoile-dev
