Le 18 avr. 07 à 08:24, Yen-Ju Chen a écrit : > On 4/16/07, Yen-Ju Chen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Well, I name it OuterSpace because people seems to like "Space", >> starting from OpenSpace.app. :) > > I just realize if we use OpenSpace manager, > there is no issue about file manager. > It is very straight-forward to import it (only the part of file > manager). > It is by far a much better choice than OuterSpace.app and Space.app.
I thought of importing in it many times in the past. The two times I took an in-depth look, I can to the same conclusion: it's very file- centric, the design isn't really flexible and won't scale up without rewriting everything from scratch. That's why I finally began to write Space. > So if Saso agrees with that, I would like to spend some time on it > and see whether it can be worked out, Feel free to do it, I'm not against using it in LiveCD 0.2. > It can also probably serve as a prototype for "object manager", maybe. I really doubt of this point. > There are two things I hope to clear first. > 1. I prefer to decompose the whole OpenSpace Manager into > several smaller components for easy reuse. > I haven't really look at the code, but I believe there are many > things > which can be shared, ex. by dock and trash can, and maybe more. The interesting things may be some views like path view, calendar view, icon view. But I'm not sure to remember them properly. > It may not be a target for LiveCD 0.2, > but in my own opinions, I cannot see a better choice for the future. OuterSpace or Space ;-) Integrating Outerspace now may have some interests, we would collect bug reports which would allows us to make OuterSpace more solid. This is specially interesting if in the end, it becomes a framework for building Workspace-like applications. Cheers, Quentin. _______________________________________________ Etoile-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/etoile-discuss
