Le 2 juil. 07 à 18:26, Yen-Ju Chen a écrit : > On 7/2/07, Jesse Ross <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Ditto for me, but I would like to test it and take a look at the >>> code >>> first. We also need to discuss with the author the possibility to >>> relicense code under BSD, I think it's GPL licensed. The problem >>> could lies in the fact Chronographer is under GPL license iirc. >> >> It doesn't depend on Chronographer anymore, so that shouldn't be a >> problem.
I wasn't sure when I read the wiki page. I have also found a mention 'inspired or based on Chronographer' for one class, but that's not a big deal anyway. >> I'm not sure what libical is under though, which is what it >> uses now. > > libical is under Mozilla Public License 1.0 or LGPL. > So I think the dependency is fine. > We just need to ask him to use BSD for the application part. > The code also looks fine to me. I'm ok with the code too. > So if there is no other objection, > I will sent out the invitation shortly > and we can discuss with him for the details. No objections. Thanks for taking care of it. Cheers, Quentin. _______________________________________________ Etoile-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/etoile-discuss
