Hi Quentin

Thanks a lot for the advise.
I spoke to David on IRC he pretty mush told me the same.
What that was missing and still is it's the -enumerateKeysAndObjectsUsingBlock: 
.
It should normally be in the gnustep since it is in the OSX foundation 
framework but I did not found it.
A part from the ETCollection+HOM is quite neat. I will use it as much as I can.

Cheers,
--
Mathieu

On Feb 27, 2012, at 8:29 PM, Quentin Mathé wrote:

> Hi Matthieu,
> 
> Le 27 févr. 2012 à 01:57, Mathieu SUEN a écrit :
> 
>> Hi All
>> 
>> I have added +map support to NSDictionary with the following method:
>> - (NSArray*) mapValues: (id)aClosure;
>> - (NSArray*) mapKeys: (id)aClosure;
>> - (void) foreachKeysAndValues: (id)aClosure;
>> - (void) foreachKeys: (id)aClosure;
>> - (void) foreachValues: (id)aClosure;
> 
> Instead of adding new API like -mapValues:, -mapKeys: etc. etc why not do as 
> below?
> 
>       dictionary values map: [ ]
> 
> I would have the same reasoning for the last foreach methods.
> 
>> If people founded valuable I can commit them. The wording in ST-80 would 
>> have been -collect: and -do: (-keysAndValuesDo: ..) but I have stick to the 
>> rules founded in NSArray+map.h
> 
> 
> All Foundation collections support the HOM and block methods declared in 
> ETCollection+HOM.h (see EtoileFoundation/Headers).
> I tend to use this API when I write Smalltalk code, rather than NSArray+map 
> which is something much older and hasn't been updated for a while.
> 
> I could be wrong, but I thought that NSArray+map was present to support a 
> Smalltalk-80 API, in addition to the EtoileFoundation collection block API.
> So I would say it's probably better to use the ST-80 wording rather than to 
> introduce a new one, given that we already have our own with 
> ETCollection+HOM.h. 
> 
> What would be nice is to change NSArray+map to be something more generic like 
> ETCollection+Smalltalk, that would add the common ST-80 collection methods to 
> the various Foundation collections, and leverage ETCollection+HOM as much as 
> possible.
> 
> Cheers,
> Quentin.
> _______________________________________________
> Etoile-discuss mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/etoile-discuss


_______________________________________________
Etoile-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/etoile-discuss

Répondre à