it is a lovely idea, NeXTism. It is hopeful in a more general sense. Things have been so distorted by money and then thinking about markets. If we could think a little more in terms of progress.
There is something particular about the NeXT graphics. It is difficult to put into words, but you can feel it in your eyes. More to do, but it is its own thing. > On 10 Feb 2015, at 22:00, [email protected] wrote: > > Send Etoile-discuss mailing list submissions to > [email protected] > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/etoile-discuss > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > [email protected] > > You can reach the person managing the list at > [email protected] > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of Etoile-discuss digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: Etoile development / future ? (O?M Keeler) > 2. Re: Etoile development / future ? ([email protected]) > 3. Re: Etoile development / future ? (O?M Keeler) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 00:32:17 +0700 > From: O?M Keeler <[email protected]> > To: Discussion list for ??toil?? desktop environment > <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [Etoile-discuss] Etoile development / future ? > Message-ID: > <CADiiHVD20YGp2FnPnT=yVCn9hzyY2sJ=q00i6n_h6gxkyya...@mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 > >>>> That's almost enough to give one hope for the future. > > And you also be noted that I have no interest in these theming and > painting icon stuffs anymore. > Not until they have a usable desktop system. From now on I'll just > shut up and continue my works on AP3 > and won't come back until I get a usable node-based raster manipulator > which I doubt I'd find a contributor > here so I won't advertise about it. > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2015 21:29:47 +0100 > From: [email protected] > To: Discussion list for ??toil?? desktop environment > <[email protected]> > Cc: O?M Keeler <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [Etoile-discuss] Etoile development / future ? > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed > > No need to argue. The point of view from developers and users is > different. > > I looked at some NeXT / GNU Step icons ... they look not bad but some > should have other colors. Why should not someone modify existing icons > to become more modern ? > > > Am 09.02.2015 18:32, schrieb O?M Keeler: >>>>> That's almost enough to give one hope for the future. >> >> And you also be noted that I have no interest in these theming and >> painting icon stuffs anymore. >> Not until they have a usable desktop system. From now on I'll just >> shut up and continue my works on AP3 >> and won't come back until I get a usable node-based raster manipulator >> which I doubt I'd find a contributor >> here so I won't advertise about it. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Etoile-discuss mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/etoile-discuss > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 3 > Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2015 20:43:02 +0000 > From: O?M Keeler <[email protected]> > To: [email protected], Discussion list for ??toil?? desktop environment > <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [Etoile-discuss] Etoile development / future ? > Message-ID: > <cadiihvbcgyozw+osjo_c5nnf_inht0jbi1mc6bzjsayrkzp...@mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > I think there are not much users. BTW, allow me to remind you that we are > not on GNUstep mailing list. And I dont really see any experience UI > designer in this very discussion so far. User and devs pov aside, but > without a proper UI designer, like jross?, to weight in I doubt we would go > anywhere. For icon designs we will need some HIG, I would just steal > existing project. It has been years and all progresses are in the backend. > Dont waste your time with the icons, if you ask me. > > On Tue, Feb 10, 2015, 03:29 null <[email protected]> wrote: > >> No need to argue. The point of view from developers and users is >> different. >> >> I looked at some NeXT / GNU Step icons ... they look not bad but some >> should have other colors. Why should not someone modify existing icons >> to become more modern ? >> >> >> Am 09.02.2015 18:32, schrieb O?M Keeler: >>>>>> That's almost enough to give one hope for the future. >>> >>> And you also be noted that I have no interest in these theming and >>> painting icon stuffs anymore. >>> Not until they have a usable desktop system. From now on I'll just >>> shut up and continue my works on AP3 >>> and won't come back until I get a usable node-based raster manipulator >>> which I doubt I'd find a contributor >>> here so I won't advertise about it. >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Etoile-discuss mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/etoile-discuss >> >> > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: </public/etoile-discuss/attachments/20150209/63b42652/attachment.html> > > ------------------------------ > > Subject: Digest Footer > > _______________________________________________ > Etoile-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/etoile-discuss > > > ------------------------------ > > End of Etoile-discuss Digest, Vol 100, Issue 7 > ********************************************** > _______________________________________________ Etoile-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/etoile-discuss
