You're correct Jeff. Pearl Jam's official stance on their official 2000 tour bootlegs was "Trade 'em...we don't care." Simple, easy to understand, no bs, no confusion...
I would assume SCI's official releases would be non-tradeable UNLESS they specifically say that trading the shows is OK. Anyone? Ken [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.mininger.org http://db.etree.org/mininger At Thursday 11:54 2/7/02, Josh Chasin wrote: >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Jeff Silverman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Interesting question... > > If people are paying for the recordings, I doubt that we could legally >trade > > them. > > What has me thinking is their stance that "fans can still continue to tape > > and trade all shows". Seems like as they have grown, they have patterned > > some things after the way phish did things, so I'm wondering if somewhere > > down the line (especially if this ends up being a successful business > > decision for them) they are going to adopt a phish-like policy about what > > versions of released shows can and can't be listed/discussed/traded in a > > public forum like this. > >I think it is important to underscore that these policies are for the band >to make, and for etree to adhere to. Am I recalling correctly that Pearl Jam >has explicitly stated that their fans may trade copies of their dozens of >officially released bootlegs of their 2000 US and european tours? >_______________________________________________ >etree.org etree mailing list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >http://mail.etree.org/mailman/listinfo/etree _______________________________________________ etree.org etree mailing list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://mail.etree.org/mailman/listinfo/etree
