On Fri, 18 Jan 2002, Linux Rocks ! wrote:
> I dont know... Those are 2 instances where cell phones were not involved... 
> Ill bet ( i dont have any statistics handy...) there are a lot more accidents 
> due to cell phones than that.
Proc Assoc Adv Automot Med Conf 2001;45:287-301
THE ROLE OF DRIVER DISTRACTION IN CRASHES: AN ANALYSIS OF 1995-1999
CRASHWORTHINESS DATA SYSTEM DATA.
Stutts JC, Reinfurt DW, Rodgman EA.
University of North Carolina, Highway Safety Research Center, Chapel Hill,
North Carolina.

Five years (1995-1999) of national Crashworthiness Data System (CDS) data
are analyzed to determine the role of driver distraction in traffic
crashes and the specific sources of this distraction. Results show that
8.3 percent of the drivers were distracted at the time of their
crash; after adjustment for the large percentage of drivers with unknown
distraction status, the percentage rose to 12.9 percent. The most
frequently cited sources of driver distraction were persons, objects or
events outside the vehicle (29.4% of distracted drivers), adjusting the
radio, tape or CD player (11.4%), and other occupants in the vehicle
(10.9%). Other specific distractions (moving objects in vehicle, other
objects brought into vehicle, adjusting vehicle or climate controls,
eating and drinking, cell phones, and smoking) were each cited in only one
to four percent of the cases. The likelihood of being distracted and the
source of distraction varied by driver age but not by gender. Results are
discussed in light of the limitations inherent in the CDS and other crash
data, and the need for expanded data collection initiatives.
PMID: 11754767

>       The way I see it, if your using a phone (or computer or whatever is 
> distracting you from the primary goal of driving), then you are saying that 
> your phone call (or computer, ...) is more important than the safety of 
> everyone in traffic
Or you could be saying that driving safely is a fairly straightforward
task for you and you can easily accomodate other tasks simultaneously
without reducing safety. Observed inverse correlation: IQ and traffic
accident rate (source: _The g Factor_ by Arthur R. Jensen).

-Chris

Reply via email to