On Mon, 24 Feb 2003, Scott Chapman wrote: > Never mind. I just read the original post and found that it's SCO version 4. > > On Monday 24 February 2003 3:58 pm, Scott Chapman wrote: > Larry, > You didn't answer the implied question :-) > > How is it that this distro is legal? Well, i was being mildly sardonic, in that legality in IP matters is one of those eye-of-beholder things.
> How does anyone know it's legal? Has all of the code been researched against > the patents owned by SCO or is there some other way to determine this? > Where are you getting this information? Yes the code was debugged by teams of lawyers, be afraid. > > Scott > > On Wednesday 19 February 2003 9:12 am, Larry Price wrote: > On Tue, 18 Feb 2003, Cory Petkovsek wrote: > > > On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 04:15:04PM -0800, Larry Price wrote: > > > The only LEGAL linux distro. > > > > What does that mean? > > SCO has threatened (or made noises perceived by the /. crowd to be > threatening) to enforce their patent rights which may or may not apply to > parts of the Linux Kernel. > > http://www.business2.com/articles/web/0,1653,46768,00.html > > > > -- > http://www.efn.org/~laprice ( Community, Cooperation, Consensus > http://www.opn.org ( Openness to serendipity, make mistakes > http://www.efn.org/~laprice/poems ( but learn from them.(carpe fructus ludi) > _______________________________________________ > Eug-LUG mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://mailman.efn.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/eug-lug > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Eug-LUG mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://mailman.efn.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/eug-lug > -- http://www.efn.org/~laprice ( Community, Cooperation, Consensus http://www.opn.org ( Openness to serendipity, make mistakes http://www.efn.org/~laprice/poems ( but learn from them.(carpe fructus ludi) _______________________________________________ Eug-LUG mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.efn.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/eug-lug
