No, because I read a report from somebody who had gone and seen their presentation and 
he said that, what little they showed him, was at best a stretch. Of course, I can't 
for the life of me, find the article at the moment. 

Garl

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Joseph Carter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 8:09 PM
> To: The Eugene Unix and GNU/Linux User Group's mail list
> Subject: Re: [eug-lug]Red Hat files suit against SCO
> 
> 
> On Tue, Aug 05, 2003 at 07:07:45AM -0700, Edward Craig wrote:
> >     Nobody not under a non-disclosure agreement signed with SCO has
> > yet determined any of the code in question.
> 
> And of course, the NDA probably has a clause prohibiting you 
> from saying,
> based on your analysis of the code in question, that SCO's claims are
> malicious and untrue.
> 
> -- 
> Joseph Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>      Available in 
> cherry and grape
>  
> <Yorick> isnt't there a windows-hosted gdb?
> <gltron> there is, but it's unbelievably sucky
> <Yorick> then there's the advanced debugger called printf
> _______________________________________________
> EuG-LUG mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://mailman.efn.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/eug-lug
> 

_______________________________________________
EuG-LUG mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mailman.efn.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/eug-lug

Reply via email to