No, because I read a report from somebody who had gone and seen their presentation and he said that, what little they showed him, was at best a stretch. Of course, I can't for the life of me, find the article at the moment.
Garl > -----Original Message----- > From: Joseph Carter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 8:09 PM > To: The Eugene Unix and GNU/Linux User Group's mail list > Subject: Re: [eug-lug]Red Hat files suit against SCO > > > On Tue, Aug 05, 2003 at 07:07:45AM -0700, Edward Craig wrote: > > Nobody not under a non-disclosure agreement signed with SCO has > > yet determined any of the code in question. > > And of course, the NDA probably has a clause prohibiting you > from saying, > based on your analysis of the code in question, that SCO's claims are > malicious and untrue. > > -- > Joseph Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Available in > cherry and grape > > <Yorick> isnt't there a windows-hosted gdb? > <gltron> there is, but it's unbelievably sucky > <Yorick> then there's the advanced debugger called printf > _______________________________________________ > EuG-LUG mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://mailman.efn.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/eug-lug > _______________________________________________ EuG-LUG mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.efn.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/eug-lug