I think we'll be going with FogBugz 3.0. We're taking advantage of
their 45 day evaluation period now. It seems to really kick ass. It
does ALMOST everything I wanted. It seems to have a VERY simple, easy
interface. The only thing I wanted to be able to do but can't is to
customize the dataset and UI for inputing a new bug into the system.
This isn't actually that big of a deal tho, as it is already collecting
99% of what I wanted, with hardly any data fields that I did not want.
Jim
On Sep 28, 2004, at 6:20 PM, Po Petz wrote:
On Tue, 28 Sep 2004, Jim Beard wrote:
Thanks for the response, I'll check out mantisbt. I was looking at
FogBugz the other day. Have you used it? I have read several of
Joel Spolsky's articles in the past and thought that he has a real
good head on his shoulders in regards to software development. I'd
be interested in checking out any of the apps he has worked on.
I used FB2 a while ago and it was extremely easy to use. We treated
it as a simple defect database so we weren't taking advantage of any
of the nicer features. In retrospect, Bugzilla would have probably
been better for that project. FB3 looks good and I've heard good
things about it from a developer and a couple of QA folk.
YMMV.
-po
_______________________________________________
EUGLUG mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug
Jim Beard
counterclaim.com, Inc
http://www.counterclaim.com
http://openefm.sourceforge.net
(800) 264-8145
_______________________________________________
EUGLUG mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug
