On 7/31/07, horst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Alan and Quentin --thanks for the pointer.
Sure thing. The project looks well thought through and documented, and I like their > philosophy, Yeah, these guys are pretty good. I'd say they err a little too far on the side of caution and end up hurting usability for it. The TCexplorer program is an example of that. It's a relatively simple tool, and if I were king, would be maintained by the core developers. It's somewhat outside the scope of the main program but satisfies a very common use case which disqualifies TC from being a viable option within a lot of enterprises. > > I noticed a few binaries for Suse and Ubuntu, and the source code for > kernel 2.6.5 or better. I am wondering if compiling for some Live "CD" > (with/on USB stick) would be a work-around for the > Windows-administrator-only caveat you mentioned? But then you would have > to train the non-techies in your organization how to use a Linux Live > system... Yeah, that's just way too much overhead, on a variety of levels. For our needs, using TCexplorer is "secure enough". Especially since 99% of the time it will be used to access data on the computers of the people who actually own the data, our clients. This fact alone almost completely mitigates the "temp file insecurity" argument that the TC people have against using TCexplorer. -- -Regards- -Quentin Hartman-
_______________________________________________ EUGLUG mailing list euglug@euglug.org http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug
