On Nov 29, 2007 5:16 PM, Ben Barrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> http://news.zdnet.com/2100-1009_22-6220719.html
> fun yet brief article, explains about a huge increase in known flaws from
> MS,
> mostly in Excel, and then explains that it is due to the increased
> profitability of finding flaws...
> I just want to know if that profitability is legitimate or bound to
> criminal activity.
>
> From what the article is saying, it sounds like it is criminal activity.
My guess would be that a good part of the increase is due to the
documentation for the "kind of XML" Office Open XML formats released when
the specification for the formats was released as a standard by  Ecma in
December, 2006. (6,037 pages). The formats are largely a dump to XML of the
in-memory binary representations of documents and the specs offer tons of
clues about how the Office major apps' internals function. I know the
earlier release of the schemas for the Officde 2003 XML formats aided our
tech guys' efforts tremendously in successfully reverse engineering the
native file format support APIs for Word and Excel.

And the Microsoft Knowledge Base is a treasure trove of known persistent
bugs in Office. So lots of information to work with, with an incredible
boost last December.

Best regards,

Marbux
_______________________________________________
EUGLUG mailing list
euglug@euglug.org
http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug

Reply via email to