I have changed the subject line to a descriptive, and non-partisan phrase. And only retained the last paragraph of the email this was extracted from.
[cut] > With that introduction, I present for your consideration "The universally > accessible and interoperable specification v. 0.01. < > http://www.universal-interop-council.org/specification>. > Please spare no punches and try to kick holes in it. > > Best regards, > Marbux It's tough reading. I can only read a few minutes at a time before my eyes glaze over. And I haven't finished. But I don't think I will be able to consider the big picture when I do finish, because of the aforementioned glazing. I think the problem of determining whether a program or dataset is conforming is difficult, and I don't know if you defined this. But it seems to me that in a practical sense only a parser can say if a dataset is conforming. How would you address this? -- Allen Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://brown.armoredpenguin.com/~abrown/ Arnold Schwarzenegger: Finally, a public official who can explain the administration's social policies in the original German. --- Bill Maher, via Bobby the Mat. _______________________________________________ EUGLUG mailing list euglug@euglug.org http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug
