I was just thunderstruck to learn -- by pure chance -- that National Review Online has referred favorably to my new SpaceDaily Pluto article! See www.nationalreview.com/miller/miller072303.asp (the link to the "good summary of the whole dispute" is to my article).
Since I usually regard National Review with about the same level of fondness as genital herpes, this leaves me rather on the spot. I never would have discovered it if moderate-liberal Harvard biologist Charles Murtaugh's blog site (which I do read) hadn't referred to John J. Miller's National Review article, which enthusiastically boosts New Horizons and urges Congress to override Bush on it. I linked to Miller's piece just because I was pleasantly surprised that NH has acquired such a surprising new ally, and there I was... They like me! They really like me! (They won't like me, however, when they learn that my sole link with conservative journalism up to now has consisted of sending nasty letters to "The American Spectator".) Note one big scientific flaw in Miller's piece, though: "If there's a Planet X out there... a delayed Pluto mission provides a poorer chance of finding it." == You are subscribed to the Europa Icepick mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project information and list (un)subscribe info: http://klx.com/europa/
