They were tooting their "Clean Car Name" horn and mentioned every clean vehicle they made except their pure electrics. Sounds like they want to change history to me. Just my opinion. Lawrence Rhodes... ----- Original Message ----- From: "VanDerWal, Peter MSgt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'EV List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 8:26 AM Subject: OT(?) Re: LA is 1st to get future technologies
> Why would it mention the EV+? Read the article and then go back and red it > again. > > The article was about their new FCV and mentioned the fact that they have > "history of automotive environmental > leadership" and cited examples of some of their 'firsts' > > They weren't the first company to develop an electric car. I'll grant you > that the EV+ was a really nice EV, but there was nothing really ground > breaking about it. They were forced to develop the EV+ along with a 1/2 > dozen other companies that were forced to build EVs for California, not > exactly something worth bragging about. > > There are only a couple companies selling EVs right now and Honda isn't one > of them, why would they point that out? > > >I thought the list declared any electric vehicle on topic. This certainly > >fits. They mentioned the cvcc, cng and hybrid vehicles with no mention of > >the EV+ something stinks. They are omiting pure electrics in the article. > >This is getting nasty. They are so afraid of Li Ion. Lawrence Rhodes.... > > > > > >> The EV List users asked that if there was a major item/milestone, > >> I was to alert them. See: > >> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/fuelcellvehicles/message/69 > > >
