Lawrence,
I have been Very Happy with my US 145s. At the time they were less
expensive and the specs were equal or better than the Trojan at high
discharge rates. US Battery is attentive to the EV population with both
info and help in getting the batteries into the hands of the EVers.
I would definitely but US Batteries again.
Todd
----- Original Message -----
From: "Lawrence Rhodes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, October 18, 2002 2:12 PM
Subject: Re: Same size more amps.
> Slightly taller is bad. I am also looking at Trojan batteries. They are
> slightly smaller but the specs. per weight look better. Any real world
> comments. I might use field weaking if possible to go faster. Lawrence
> Rhodes...
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Friday, October 18, 2002 8:03 AM
> Subject: Re: Same size more amps.
>
>
> > Lawrence,
> >
> > The US 145s are slightly taller. When I did my calculations a
> > couple years ago I came up with a better power to weight ration on the
> 145s
> > than the other models. I also concluded they had a lower internal
> > resistance and better peukert. I think the later was something that was
> > based on reading the US literature but I don't remember now.
> >
> > Todd Hunter
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > At 12:32 AM 10/18/2002 -0700, you wrote:
> > >I saw on the US Battery website that all their 2200 thur 145s have the
> same
> > >case. There is an eleven pound difference and greater amps in the
> heavier
> > >units. Do the heavier units also last longer? Is there one model that
> has
> > >the longest life? There must be some reason for the slight
differences.
> > >They must save money by using one case. I am interested because I need
> to
> > >put batteries in the Laher. Lawrence Rhodes....
> >
>
>
>
