I think I agree with everything you said EXCEPT that if coals provides most 
power, it *is* an issue, and a matter of credibility if you don't acknowledge 
it.

Sure, if there are options to avoid that, by all means, point those out. In 
fact, it doesn't really matter what % is using those options.

I don't think I said anything about condemning EV owners. 


Sent from my iPhone

On Aug 17, 2015, at 1:20 PM, Robert Bruninga via EV <ev@lists.evdl.org> wrote:

>> I agree, but in some areas a lot of the energy *is*
>> being produced by coal. So there's a need to avoid understating that.
> 
> I disagree completely.  Electricity can be 90% coal in some areas, but if
> 83% of EV owners are putting up solar or subscribing to wind power then
> there is no need to condem all EV owners for coal when only 17% of them
> are using it and intend to continue to use it.
> 
>> Fortunately, the amount of electricity produced by coal
>> will be dropping fairly quickly.
> 
> But for 83% of us, it has dropped to Zero NOW. We aren't waiting.
> 
> I'll be darned if I am going to be condemned for burning coal when I
> don't.  Just like I don't like the implication that if 20% of Americans
> smoke, then on average, I smoke 4 out of every cigarette in every pack of
> 20.  I don't smoke any and I don't use ANY coal for fuel for my EV.
> 
> Bob, WB4APR
> 
> 
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
>>> On Aug 17, 2015, at 6:05 AM, EVDL Administrator via EV
>> <ev@lists.evdl.org> wrote:
>> 
>> Who would have thought even a decade ago that FORD would be issuing
>> apparently pro-EV news releases?
>> 
>> That said, IMO we need to be a little more careful how we use the Ford
>> survey data.  It doesn't say that 83% of EV owners are charging their
>> EVs with PV.  It says that 83% of them HAVE or ARE INTERESTED IN
>> GETTING PV capacity.  That's a pretty substantial difference.
>> 
>> Regrettably I can't find a web resource that breaks out the have-its
>> from the wanna-have-its.  So, this number doesn't really tell us
>> anything about how many current EV owners are charging with alternative
> energy.
>> 
>> What it does suggest is a strong correlation between EV ownership and
>> environmental consciousness.
>> 
>> In terms of selling and promoting EVs, you can view this in two ways.
>> One is that promoters should "fish where the fish are," and continue
>> pushing EVs "green cred" or even increase these efforts.  The other is
>> to say that the way to increased EV adoption is to edge toward
>> promoting their dollars-and- cents value.
>> 
>> Which is the right EV promotion strategy?  To determine that, we
>> should look at the reasons that owners bought gas-only "hybrids" 10-12
>> years ago, vs why they buy them today.  If we see a substantial
>> increase in Prius and other non-pluggable "hybrid" sales among
>> cost-conscious buyers over that decade, that might suggest that at
>> some point (though maybe not yet) we should swing toward promoting
>> EVs' economic benefits.  If the majority of non-plug "hybrid" buyers
>> still buy them for their "greenness," that argues in favor of the first
> strategy above.
>> 
>> Either way, we have a big job ahead of us to counter the growing
>> negative PR being dispensed by the traditional energy providers.  They
>> have way more media clout than we do, and seem to be doing very well
>> at sowing FUD about EVs supposedly "increasing pollution" with
>> trumped-up, bogus data about coal fired powerplants.
>> 
>> David Roden - Akron, Ohio, USA
>> EVDL Administrator
>> 
>> = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = EVDL
>> Information: http://www.evdl.org/help/ = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
>> = = = = = = = = = = = = =
>> Note: mail sent to "evpost" and "etpost" addresses will not reach me.
>> To send a private message, please obtain my email address from the
>> webpage http://www.evdl.org/help/ .
>> = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
>> http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
>> For EV drag racing discussion, please use NEDRA
>> (http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEDRA)
> _______________________________________________
> UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
> http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
> For EV drag racing discussion, please use NEDRA
> (http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEDRA)
> _______________________________________________
> UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
> http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
> For EV drag racing discussion, please use NEDRA 
> (http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEDRA)
> 
> 
_______________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
For EV drag racing discussion, please use NEDRA 
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEDRA)

Reply via email to