Ah, unintended consequences. I don't see this as deliberately anti-EV, even if it may have that effect. It appears to be aimed solely at limiting perceived social / public harm from Uber and Lyft. That perceived harm may or may not be a real problem, but that's not what we're here on the EVDL to discuss.
> Professional management under a shared model is the only way EVs can, > in a practical sense, be put to use in ridesharing, given the > complexities of operating them for this use. I don't see how that follows. (In other words: say what?) > The proposed ruling would prohibit car sharing companies like Evercar, > which operates a fleet of more than 50 EVs in Los Angeles, from > operating. Just make an exception in the law, or write it more narrowly. David Roden - Akron, Ohio, USA EVDL Administrator = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = EVDL Information: http://www.evdl.org/help/ = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Note: mail sent to "evpost" and "etpost" addresses will not reach me. To send a private message, please obtain my email address from the webpage http://www.evdl.org/help/ . = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = _______________________________________________ UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org Read EVAngel's EV News at http://evdl.org/evln/ Please discuss EV drag racing at NEDRA (http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEDRA)
