On Thu, Jun 1, 2023 at 4:17 PM Galen Charlton via Evergreen-dev < [email protected]> wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jun 1, 2023 at 4:09 PM Jeff Davis via Evergreen-dev < > [email protected]> wrote: > > Whichever language the community chooses, I am excited about the Redis > > development! I'm glad Bill has been pushing this forward. > > I would like to echo this sentiment. I think the Redis work has the > potential to be an infrastructure change that is directly and immediately > apparent to users via greater speed and responsiveness in the interfaces, > and in the short term I'm in favor of whatever gets RediSRF moving along > the fastest. > Makes sense. I'm also eager to get this code into production. My takeaways: 1. There is interest in Rust, but we need to marinate a bit more. 2. The Redis changes should proceed as an independent project. I'll see what I can do about the remaining work. Notably, the Redis branch is required for any of the Rust code that I've developed to work. So, moving OpenSRF to Redis is a good first step regardless. Thanks again for the thoughtful responses, -b
_______________________________________________ Evergreen-dev mailing list [email protected] http://list.evergreen-ils.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/evergreen-dev
