Thanks Elizabeth, would it be possible to get a copy of that script?  I
have a few scripts for editing MARC data but I would like to see how others
have done it.
Josh


On Thu, Jan 15, 2026 at 8:57 AM Thomsen, Elizabeth <[email protected]> wrote:

> We have a script that runs daily and finds new 263 fields with any of
> these formats:
> 4 digit dates MMYY
> 6 digit dates YYYYMM
> 8 digit dates YYYYMMDD
>
> It  reformats them to MM/DD/YYYY and removes the 263 from records if the
> date is in the past.  I'm attaching a screenshot from our catalog but we're
> now using Aspen for our public catalog, without this data.
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 15, 2026 at 9:38 AM Josh Stompro via Evergreen-general <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>> A custom facet might be the way to go, thanks for the suggestion.  That
>> would make it much more accessible to users.  We would probably purge the
>> info after a certain amount of time, I'm not sure we need to be able to
>> show what was released several months / years ago for each month.
>>
>> Josh
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 15, 2026 at 8:23 AM Sierra Chastain-Rittue via
>> Evergreen-general <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I am fully spit-balling with this, but you may be able to make a custom
>>> facet
>>> <https://aspen-discovery.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/Help/pages/381648900/Facets#Custom-Facets>
>>> that looks at that field in the MARC? That could get messy quickly, though,
>>> with variations in date format and changes to pub dates. A translation map
>>> that you maintain regularly may be necessary, in that case. I'll be curious
>>> to see if you can get this working somehow!
>>>
>>> Best,
>>> Sierra
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jan 15, 2026 at 9:06 AM Karen Young via Evergreen-general <
>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Josh -- I don't think that I have all the pieces of the puzzle, but
>>>> I might have a few. We have pub date information come over in our vendor
>>>> brief records in the 260 $c. For us and our import settings, if the
>>>> incoming record matches to an incumbent record, that pub date is NOT
>>>> retained in the MARC, but I suspect there could be a way to retain it by
>>>> editing your import settings (maybe? I've never actually attempted this.)
>>>> Ingram allows you to format the pub date in several ways (and you can also
>>>> have it come over in the 246 $c):
>>>> [image: image.png]
>>>> I've worked with vendors other than Ingram to include pub dates in our
>>>> MARC downloads and they've all been able to do it.
>>>>
>>>> As for how you could easily find and use info from the 260 $c or 264 $c
>>>> in Aspen... I'm not sure. (Maybe there's a way to get the date out of the
>>>> MARC and into a notes field or call number in an automated fashion?) Of
>>>> course the dates do occasionally become incorrect if pub dates get pushed.
>>>>
>>>> Hope some of this is helpful.
>>>>
>>>> Best,
>>>> Karen
>>>>
>>>> *Karen Young* *(she, her, hers)*
>>>> Manager of Cataloging & Acquisitions
>>>> Kirkwood Public Library <https://kirkwoodpubliclibrary.org/>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Jan 14, 2026 at 4:35 PM Josh Stompro via Evergreen-general <
>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hello, I was recently asked about generating lists of titles in Aspen
>>>>> that will be released by month for 2026.  We use on order records to get
>>>>> those titles into our system so customers can start placing holds on them.
>>>>>
>>>>> Does anyone have a system for pulling in the release dates right now?
>>>>> Anyone make use of the release dates for marketing?
>>>>>
>>>>> We have some records with MARC 263a data that was already added, but
>>>>> only 38% of our on order records come in with that data.  And it looks 
>>>>> like
>>>>> the data that is there isn't following the standard of YYYYMM and is 
>>>>> mostly
>>>>> YYMM.  With a few records having YYYYMMDD info.  So it needs to be cleaned
>>>>> up in any case.
>>>>> https://www.loc.gov/marc/bibliographic/bd263.html
>>>>>
>>>>> It looks like a keyword search in aspen will pull up records based on
>>>>> the 263a data - 2601 or 202601 works to grab those records.
>>>>>
>>>>> So I was just looking around at how I could pull in that data for the
>>>>> rest of them without making extra work for our cataloger.
>>>>>
>>>>> It looks like amazon probably has the information in their APIs.   I
>>>>> checked  a few titles in Google Books API and didn't get any results, and
>>>>> tried Open Library also, but they don't seem to have unreleased books in 
>>>>> my
>>>>> spot checks.  I don't have an ISBNdb account to see if they include the
>>>>> street date.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks
>>>>> Josh
>>>>> [image: Company logo]
>>>>> *Josh Stompro*
>>>>> *IT Director *
>>>>> [email protected] | 218-233-3757 ext. 139
>>>>> *Lake Agassiz Regional Library*
>>>>> 118 5th ST S
>>>>> Moorhead MN 56560
>>>>> www.larl.org
>>>>> *Our mission is to enrich lives and strengthen communities.*
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Evergreen-general mailing list --
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>> To unsubscribe send an email to
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Evergreen-general mailing list --
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> To unsubscribe send an email to
>>>> [email protected]
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> Sierra Chastain-Rittue (she/they)
>>> Web Support Specialist, C/W MARS, Inc.
>>>
>>> ------------------------------
>>>
>>> [image: icon] [email protected] | [image: icon] www.cwmars.org
>>>
>>> [image: icon] 508-755-3323 x 1
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Evergreen-general mailing list --
>>> [email protected]
>>> To unsubscribe send an email to
>>> [email protected]
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Evergreen-general mailing list --
>> [email protected]
>> To unsubscribe send an email to
>> [email protected]
>>
>
>
> --
> Elizabeth B. Thomsen
> (she/her)
> Member Services Manager
> NOBLE: North of Boston Library Exchange
> Danvers, Mass.
>
>
_______________________________________________
Evergreen-general mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to