On Sun, 11 Mar 2001, James Higgo wrote: > Scott: that was clearly ill-thought-out. Of course difference does not imply > time, and of course this e-mail is not proof that there is a 'person' called > James...
Is this (just) a game to you? Scott
On Sun, 11 Mar 2001, James Higgo wrote: > Scott: that was clearly ill-thought-out. Of course difference does not imply > time, and of course this e-mail is not proof that there is a 'person' called > James...
Is this (just) a game to you? Scott