No fair using time in your definition of time. Brent Meeker
On 04-Mar-01, Saibal Mitra wrote: > > Since conventional physics is sufficient to give (at least in > principle) a complete description of the human brain, a partial > ordering on the set of all possible observer moments S can be defined > as follows: > > First we choose an arbitrary brain B. > If x1 and x2 are elements of S, then x1 < x2 iff both x1 and x2 can > be experienced by B and an initial condition specifying the entire > state of the (conventional) universe including that of B exists such > that x1 is experienced by B at some time t1 and x2 is experienced at > some time t2 and t1 < t2. > > On any totally ordered subset of S one thus also has a definition of > time. So, even if one believes that nothing but OM's exists, one can > still define useful concepts on S. > > > > Saibal
