Dear John, It seems that you are saying that information is only information to a "recognizer" of such. If this is so, how do we define such? As to the notion of "no information" as information, this seems to fall under the definition of "counterfactuals". (Hal Ruhl might have a thought to add to this.) I remember reading somewhere that the fact that no detection event occurring in a QM situation is still an informative event. I believe that the so-called "non-demolition" measurements are related. Any thoughts?
Kindest regards, Stephen ----- Original Message ----- From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Stephen Paul King" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Eric Hawthorne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "James N Rose" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2002 11:40 AM Subject: Re: The universe consists of patterns of arrangement of 0's and 1's? > Dear Stephen, please see my note after the copy of your post snip > I defined information as "difference acknowledged" (by no specified > acknowledger) because not all information DO make a difference, yet an > unrecognized difference is no information. > With the Plenitude (a version as the basis for my narrative leading to our > universe) I have a question: Is "no information" not an information? > (Or: is "no difference" an information about identicity?) > JM > > >