When I said in my previous post:
"The All of course contains a kernel re the founding definition and thus there is an infinitely nested potential to have All/Nothing pairs."
I meant to add that this seemed necessary to the system in that the origin of the dynamic basically destroys [Nothing, All] pairs but there is an infinite potential to form new Nothings.
The infinite nesting in this definition should not effect the zero information of the All because kernels that are definitions [is, is not] pairs can be balanced by an [is not, is] definitional pair kernel which defines the same entities.
I think that gets me rather close to what I set out to do.
Hal
